A day in the life of India

My experiments with Life

Gays, lesbian, nature and darwin..

with 19 comments

I think in this whole homo issue nobody is asking the right question, if we need the right answers right questions need to put forward, here i try to ask some questions.

Is being gay un-natural?

Arent these gays created by nature then how can they be unnatural, if they were test tube babies i would say its some what un natural, but they are conceived and brought up as everyone else has been then how is is un-natural?
Is it un-natural to fuck a guy’s ass or get your ass fucked by a guy?
Sex is not as simple as it is assumed, sex shouldnt necessarily result into procreation, considering todays world may be 10% of the total sexual acts is within an intention of procreation. Others do it for re-creation. When something is done for recreation people have various preferences, we choose various methods to entertain us, some watch/play sports, some like movies, some may done and some may do drugs. The same way people have various sexual preferences some like licking, some like sucking, some like fucking ass and others like fucking the ass of a male and some like their asses to be fucked.. Whats the fucking problem with that its not about being gay or lesbain its just their fucking sexual preference.. i dont see anything wrong here.. sex sometimes gets pretty unnatural when people like to eat shit of their partner or drink urine, if this is ok then whats wrong with getting one’s ass fucked.
Does one become gay by birth or by the surrounding?
Both is possible as in the case of sexual preference you are either born with a particular sexual preference or some incidents leave an impression on your mind that leads to a particular kind of sexual nature.
What would have darwin said?
Darwin is the smart ass who has a strong logic, and for athesits he is near to god. If we take into account theory of evolution the sole purpose of every species to increase the number of its species to push its gene further. Every activity that a species does can be said to be a activity done in order to have more of its species. So a home-sexual doesnt actually indulge in pro-creation thus limits the growth of his species, why is that. People would say in animal kingdom also some percentage of a species show homo-sexual tendencies but i would say can anyone guarantee that particular animal never indulges in procreational activity, i say that animal that they are referring to is not homo-sexual its just that it is bi-sexual. Could it be possible that particular gay person has some faulty genes and the genes dont want them to be transmitted to a further generation, is it possible that the gene has reached its expiry date and it is commiting a suicide?
Is it a nature’s conspiracy?
We fucking human (i hate humans the most) have become the king of all species, we literally control all species and we are growing at an astounding rate. If we grow at this rate we are certainly limiting the chances of survival of other species we are destroying the earth, we have taken everything from earth as if its our bapp ka jaagir, what about other animals rights, they have equal rights to the earth. Every species ought to have equal rights.
By accident we have garnered too much intelligence, this will lead to our own self destruction one day.
Nature’s primary role is to keep a balance, and we humans have fought with nature in every way. Nobody dies in draught now, we have managed floods to some extent, most of the diseases are in our control. What does the nature do to limit our numbers it creates diseases; new one, like AIDS; this is a sure shot nature’s way of limiting our numbers. nature wanted us to fuck each other into extinction, but nature forgot that it has endowed too much intelligence onto us; we came up with condoms, Its like the science fiction where we created robots and they destroyed us same way the nature created us and it was its biggest mistake and now the humans are striking back at it for control of the earth, now what would nature do, will it make all people gay?? i think the number of gays are increasing i think the nature is trying to limit our numbers this way..
couldnt it be possible, is it too hard to believe??
P.S. its not that i have become a conspiracy theorist but we need to look at other ways, we need to understand things in a different light.

Written by maya

June 30, 2009 at 10:29 am

Posted in my views, uncommon

19 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. i am impressed with the bashing part in ur profile…..and like the way you write! an absolute straight approach!


    June 30, 2009 at 11:20 am

  2. Maya… i think Darwin was adopted … hehehhehe..


    June 30, 2009 at 11:56 am

  3. If it is a balancing act then why a slow and gradual process, a very slow balancing act, considering the number of gays & lesbo's :)Why not an eternal damage or something mind blowing which damages the half of the race away, anyways you hate humans :)[Including you :)]Secondly, i understood that nature is controlling the things around us and humans are not, if this is what u wanted to say.What if people want to screw animals one day? πŸ˜›

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 12:41 pm

  4. If nature takes a drastic step like flood, famine or earth quake then the animals are also at risk, the nature just wants to limit the humans so its focusing to do it by way of diseases and tweaking of genes to become gays.nature is no god, it works within certain set of laws which governs humans as well as itself. we are part of nature but we are like a cancer that is taking over other parts of the body..by screwing animals do u means to fuck them? or to destory them.. for the second and first part there arent enuf animals left to screw them, we have already destroyed most of them.. and people do screw animals, goat seems to be their favourite choice

    Uncommon Sense

    June 30, 2009 at 1:02 pm

  5. Oh! If nature is so intelligent then it will manage to kill a mass gathering :)e.g: Ask poor people to come to a place for free lunch, kill them :)2nd example: Ask rich people to attend a asaraam/ramdev/sundhanshu type spiritual meet πŸ™‚ Kill them all.And I wanted to know, what do you think goat>>buffallo screwing act? Tomorrow, what if a bill has to be passed for that in the parliament. πŸ˜›

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 1:11 pm

  6. as i said nature can act only within some laws, it cant target rich or poor. it will balance the number of humans but it cant order some millitants to go and kill a particular gathering,, u r taking me in the wrong sense.. nature doesnt has eyes but it feels… that law is already there,, you cud certainly end up in jail if u fuck an animal.

    Uncommon Sense

    June 30, 2009 at 1:32 pm

  7. ahahaha, nature seems to a slave or bonded laborer :)You are talking about laws and orders which bound the nature :)Secondly law about not-fucking an animal is there, I asked your opinion about humans asking to give a license to FUCK the animals, one day.As gay~ism(it is an old//older phenomenon although, back to Brahmachari Ashram Days) is being legalized today, what will you write the day screwing goats and cows will be legalized?? πŸ˜€

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 1:40 pm

  8. i thing dis is a meaningless topic..

    CrAzYy..! ;)

    June 30, 2009 at 2:15 pm

  9. OMG!! U also think πŸ™‚

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 2:46 pm

  10. I agree that we need to ask questions that make sense. And your questions are those sensible minds are asking about, so most of them are acceptable. But, I have reservations accepting that gays don't help procreate. Many gay and lesbian 'unions' have adopted babies (by artificial ways and means), so a direct link between population reduction can't be stressed much. Yes, they need to be left free to practice their sexual preferences … and we shouldn't have the audacity to poke our ugly nose freaking about it …


    June 30, 2009 at 3:19 pm

  11. @ Tarun everyone is a slave of cause and effect, nobody can work outside these laws, if nature one day wants to make a mountain fly it cant because its bound by laws of gravity… the topic about gay is about consensus, if today people want to have sex and both the parties dont have any problem then we shudnt have problem,, but in case of animal the animal is not giving its consensus so basically it becomes a sexual abuse, and sexual abuse cant be legalised…Even during asharam days the homo act was not considered a criminal offense, but today it is a criminal offence. Two people indulging in mutual sex should not be considered a criminal offence simply because there is no crime involved..@crazy every thing ever writeen on this blog is meaningless, there is too much competition in the meaningful space..@Idlemind adoption and artificial ways cant be considered as procreation because they are not the results of a sexual act.. and neither do they help in spreading there genes which i think goes contrary to theory of evolution..certainly agree with you that they shud be allowed to do whatever they want since they are in no way harming others…seems like my blog today is witnessing typical crowded-shop effect, we tend to go the shop where it is more croweded thinking that something is good there… all these days there werent much comments but seeing some comments others have started commenting… i guess its good.

    Uncommon Sense

    June 30, 2009 at 3:33 pm

  12. So you mean no body is FREE. Everyone includes everyone.Everyone is Slave, no body is free πŸ™‚ not a nice thing to hear, at least from you. But again so many people, so many views :)P.S: Believe me, Everyone is free, everyone.

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 4:56 pm

  13. Yes nobody is free, i will do a separate post on this, then we can knock the logic out of each other..

    Uncommon Sense

    June 30, 2009 at 5:16 pm

  14. Well definitely. The perfect exapmle of freedom is you, btw.You write what you want, you see what you want, you dropped out of college [out of choice i guess], sorry if I said more than I should, you smoke up and down, what else is freedom?May be you are adamant or may be you are insane or may be Everyone is Free πŸ™‚

    Tarun Goel

    June 30, 2009 at 5:38 pm

  15. people do think i m a free person, if it such were a case i would have taken the freedom and used my real name in this blogyou can always bring out the drop-out thing its something tht i m proud of

    Uncommon Sense

    June 30, 2009 at 6:25 pm

  16. That means you are a loser if you have deliberately used the disguise :)You don't want to own what you write and think??Is it so??

    Tarun Goel

    July 1, 2009 at 11:17 pm

  17. Well you can certainly say that, i could own certain things i write, but things i write about my friends and relatives it will be kind of breach of trust because i have not asked their permission before disclosing their details.. thts the only reason for this delibrate mask.i dont someday want my sister to read this and know about the three some that we have between my chacha chachi and me.

    Uncommon Sense

    July 2, 2009 at 10:31 am

  18. @ Tarun,Your homophobia is showing. :)Why else would you link homosexuality with beastiality? Is there a relation? Do englighten.What "uncommon sense" was trying to phrase is a theory commonly known as Gaia-ism. The belief that our planet is a living organism. Just like your body is a living organism. Your hair is not even really alive. The cells in your finger do not have much intelligence. But your brain cells or at least the brain does have intelligence. And yet, it is your body which is alive. Your brain, without a body, cannot do much.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesisGaia-ism theory proposes that earth is similar. And the gais organism need not be intelligent. Correct? Gaia theory believes that diseases are the planet's immune system, trying to regulate its system. A donkey's body doesn't invites its diseases for lunch, dinner or anything in order to kill it. It just uses the means available to it, to protect itself. A donkey is not very intelligent as compared to humans. And yet its body still has an immune system. Actually Tarun, even you are not very intelligent compared to most humans, or even some donkeys for that matter, but rest assured your body too possesses an immune system, which also deals with its diseases without any dinners being involved.Humans are part of the system, as much as cells are part of your body. But if some part of your body becomes a tumour, your body will face problems. Tarun, seems like "uncommon sense" has been able to think of all this, and you have been unable to use even the basic common sense. I suppose all these ideas are beyond your mental ability to understand. Too bad.Now let us get back to your homophobia. If someone wants to have sex with an animal, where is the consent of the animal for this? You will in-effect be raping a poor helpless animal. It may indeed cause trauma to the poor animal and will be considered cruelty. So no such bill can be passed.Consensual homosexual sex between two adults harms no one else however, and is not being cruel to anyone and is not rape since it is consensual. Are you finally able to understand this amazing concept? Has it filtered through? Ah, we can only hope for miracles.Oh, and all this would have been obvious if you had actually bothered to read the post, instead of trying to think so much about the blogger's identity. Why is his identity important to you beyond perhaps your desire to make personal attacks on him and his family somehow? If he was a guy named "Chetan sharma" or "ramu mishra" or whatever, will it change what he wrote somehow?It is the ideas that are important. And they should be considered on their own merit. It doesn't matters one bit who is the author.


    January 27, 2010 at 12:43 am

  19. @TarunWill add this about freedom.Everyone is free. subject to the constraint that they have to accept the consequences and responsibilities that come with the said freedom.Yes, everyone is free. Just like you are free to murder anyone.And then the society and others are free to catch you and put you in jail and then hang you for your particular expression of freedom.Or did you mean that you are "freeeeee" and can defy the laws of gravity if you wished, and we will soon see you on TV, flying around like superman?Is that what you meant by freedom?Probably not. It seems more likely you resented the freedom of speech that "uncommon sense" has exercised.(Personally most of us couldn't make much sense of what you were trying to say, beyond your obvious interest in trying to be a smart-ass and trying to insult others).I doubt you know much about history, given your intellectual capacity, but there used to be a person called Chandrashekhar azaad. He chose Azaad as his surname, signifying he was free. And yet he was a master of disguises, using false names to attack bigotry and oppression of those who would unjustly try to cause harm to innocents. so Tarun, was Chandrashekhar azaad a "loser" too according to you, since he too used disguises and fake names?Because that is exactly what you seem to be saying.And I find you and your bigotry and insulting of freedom fighters who used similar disguises, much more disgusting than even those who may practice "sex with animals".- hindianguy


    January 27, 2010 at 1:02 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: